camera trajectory
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Ventura County > Thousand Oaks (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > Wales (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Law (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (0.93)
- Information Technology (0.67)
- Government (0.67)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūbu > Ishikawa Prefecture > Kanazawa (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.67)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūbu > Ishikawa Prefecture > Kanazawa (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūbu > Nagano Prefecture > Nagano (0.04)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūbu > Ishikawa Prefecture > Kanazawa (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.05)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- Asia (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (0.95)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > South Australia > Adelaide (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūbu > Ishikawa Prefecture > Kanazawa (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- North America > United States > Ohio > Montgomery County > Dayton (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Information Technology (0.68)
- Media > Television (0.32)
- Media > Photography (0.32)
- Media > Film (0.32)
Object Reprojection Error (ORE): Camera pose benchmarks from lightweight tracking annotations
Semantic modeling approaches employed on monocular video often ingest outputs from off-the-shelf SLAM/SfM pipelines, which are anecdotally observed to perform poorly or fail completely on some fraction of the videos of interest. These target videos may vary widely in complexity of scenes, activities, camera trajectory, etc. Unfortunately, such semantically-rich video data often comes with no ground-truth 3D information, and in practice it is prohibitively costly or impossible to obtain ground truth reconstructions or camera pose post-hoc. This paper proposes a novel evaluation protocol, Object Reprojection Error (ORE) to benchmark camera trajectories; ORE computes reprojection error for static objects within the video and requires only lightweight object tracklet annotations. These annotations are easy to gather on new or existing video, enabling ORE to be calculated on essentially arbitrary datasets. We show that ORE maintains high rank correlation with standard metrics based on groundtruth.